This question came from one of our users:
"My unit has been uninhabitable since November 2024. Is my landlord responsible for utilities?"
This question contemplates what the remedies for breach of the Implied Warranty of Habitability are under Illinois law. Illinois law does not make the landlord responsible for paying utilities if the rental unit they are leasing becomes uninhabitable. However, Illinois law does allow the renter to withhold rent or recover the cost of repairs.
To understand why Illinois would allow a renter to recover or withhold rent, but not necessarily utilities, for a breach of the Implied Warranty of Habitability, it might be helpful to have some background on the warranty itself.
Implied Warranty of Habitability
An Implied Warranty of Habitability is present in every lease, and it allows the tenant to recover damages from the landlord for breach of that warranty. Suppose a landlord fails to provide habitable premises. In that case, this entitles the tenant to either (1) withhold rent, in the form of the reduction in rental value resulting in the premises from the condition rendering it uninhabitable, or (2) make repairs and then deduct the cost of these repairs.
It should be noted that neither of these two enumerated remedies justifies the renter withholding the cost of utilities: the landlord's responsibility to pay utilities is solely determined by the contractual agreements between the landlord and the tenant. Unless such a provision obligated the landlord to pay utilities exists in the lease itself, then the landlord is not responsible for the utilities, and the tenant may not withhold the cost thereof.
This is because the landlord, all else being equal, has a possessory interest in the land he leases to the tenant: he or she is not typically the owner or provider of utilities. Thus, the agreement between the tenant and the landlord for the lease is a different agreement than that between the tenant and a utility provider for that property's utilities (gas, electric, etc.), as both agreements are founded on different forms of consideration (consideration is the ""something"" gotten in exchange for something else).
Because a different party other than the landlord is typically responsible for providing utilities and the landlord is responsible for providing habitable premises as part of the lease, a landlord is not automatically liable for the cost of utilities given a breach of the Implied Warranty of Habitability (that is, for failing to provide habitable premises to the tenant).
To illustrate both situations under which a tenant is entitled to recover damages from the landlord for breach of the Implied Warranty of Habitability, suppose moisture in a wall of the property prevents the installed heating unit from working. Since the Implied Warranty of Habitability covers adequate heating, the tenant could pay to have the wall and unit repaired and then deduct the cost from the rent or sue to recover the cost of the repair.
Further, suppose that a fault in the ceiling that rendered the premises uninhabitable is considered by the court to have reduced the rental value of the unit by $200: then the tenant would be entitled to withhold that $200 for each month of the lease during which the premises were uninhabitable or sue to recover for that portion of the rent tendered by the tenant.
Designed for general information use only. The content above does not constitute legal advice or the formation of an attorney/client relationship.