In this article...
A lawsuit is initiated in Illinois when the Plaintiff files a document called a Complaint, stating a cause of action which would entitle the plaintiff from relief from the court, and requesting damages or other relief from the court. The complaint lays out the relevant allegations in the case that would entitle the plaintiff to a claim against the defendant.
After the complaint has been filed, the defendant can either file an Answer, which admits or denies the allegations of the plaintiff and raises any affirmative defenses that would defeat the plaintiff claims; or, the defendant can file a Motion to Dismiss, which states that there is either a defect in the Complaint or some other affirmative matter which requires the court to dismiss the case.
There are two types of Motions to Dismiss: 2-615 Motions and 2-619 Motions. The names of these motions are based on the statute that provides for them (735 ILCS 5/2-615 and 735 ILCS 5/2-619 respectively). 2-615 Motions and 2-619 Motions serve different purposes.
2-615 Motions to Dismiss
In a 2-615 Motion to Dismiss, the defendant argues that there is some defect on the face of the Complaint that makes it improper and makes dismissal of the case appropriate. Typically, 2-615 Motions are granted when the Complaint fails to state allegations which amount to a cause of action. For example, a cause of action for civil assault requires the plaintiff to plead the following elements: (1) an intentional act; (2) directed toward the plaintiff; (3) that causes the plaintiff a reasonable apprehension of an imminent offensive contact with the plaintiff's person. If the plaintiff fails to allege in her complaint that the offensive action was intentional, she has failed to allege facts amounting to a cause of action for assault, and a 2-615 Motion to Dismiss will result in her case being dismissed.
Despite what many television programs portray, only about 0.6% of civil cases actually make it to the trial phase. So, what is your attorney doing the rest of the time? Simply put: discovery.
Your attorney’s job is to literally discover how strong or weak your case is, and how to proceed from there. In order to do that, your attorney has to do a considerable amount of research. And, we’re not talking legal research here, I mean factual research.
Your attorney has to uncover as much as he or she possibly can about you, your adversary, and the situation leading to you hiring an attorney to determine what course of action is best for you. The vast majority of civil cases settle during this discovery phase because one side or other comes across facts that tell the attorney the client would be unlikely to win at trial. So, how does this whole process begin?
Civil Litigation begins with the filing of a Complaint in the appropriate court (we will discuss how to determine which court is appropriate in subsequent articles on Jurisdiction and Venue). In the Complaint, the Plaintiff alleges the facts that underlie his or her claim against the Defendant and requests damages or other relief from the court.
Once the Complaint is on file and the Defendant is served with a summons (i.e., notice that the Complaint was filed), the Defendant is given the opportunity to respond to the Plaintiff’s allegations. Assuming that the Complaint survives any Motion to Dismiss filed by the defendant, the Defendant will file an answer to the allegations of the Complaint. Once the Complaint has been answered, the case is “at issue” and the discovery phase of litigation begins.
The first step of this phase is to issue written discovery. Written discovery consists of four primary types of documents: (1) written interrogatories; (2) requests for production of documents; (3) requests for admission of facts; and (4) third party subpoenas.
- Written interrogatories are written questions to the opposing party, to which that party must respond in writing.
- Requests for production of documents are requests for the opposing party to make available to the requestor certain documents in its possession.
- Requests for admission of facts are requests for the opposing party to admit or deny certain facts, or the validity of certain documents.
- Third party subpoenas are written interrogatories and requests for production of documents issued to people and organizations that are NOT parties to the lawsuit.
Typically, each side will initially object to certain interrogatories and requests for production, on one of the following bases:
- that the discovery request seeks information that is not relevant to the case;
- that the discovery request is overly broad (i.e., not narrowly tailored to discovering only relevant information);
- that the discovery request is unduly burdensome (i.e., the burden of gathering the information sufficiently outweighs the relevance of the information); or
- that the requested information is subject to attorney/client or some other privilege.
An objecting party will often withhold the information that it claims is not discoverable. If the requesting party feels that the other side’s objection is meritless, or if the other side fails to timely produce the requested information or documents, the requesting party must send a letter to the party that it believes is wrongfully withholding information or documents in an effort to resolve discovery objections outside of court. This letter should detail the deficiencies in the other party’s discovery responses, explain why such responses are deficient, and request that the withholding party supplement its deficient answers within a specified time period.
If, after this time period expires, the parties are not able to work out their discovery differences, the requesting party is entitled to file a Motion to Compel Discovery. Both Illinois and Indiana law require that the parties attempt to work out their discovery differences outside of court before a Motion to Compel will be granted. If the judge grants a Motion to Compel, he or she will order the answering party to answer the requesting party’s discovery more appropriately or fully, and may assess attorney fees expended by the requesting party to obtain such information. If the answering party fails to appropriately respond within the time period established by the court, the answering party will be held in contempt.
As new information comes to light throughout the course of the written discovery phase, each side will issue a second or third set of interrogatories and production requests is necessary.
Both sides will usually wait for complete and satisfactory answers to their written discovery requests and subpoenas before scheduling depositions. The reason for this is twofold. First, depositions are expensive, and free written discovery allows us to narrow our focus in order to lessen their cost. Second, complete written discovery is a useful tool to keep the deponent from evading complete answers in his or her deposition.
The written discovery phase can range from two months to longer than a year, depending on the complexity of the litigation and the willingness of the opposing sides to cooperate with one another. Although a lengthy discovery phase can be frustrating to litigants, thorough discovery is an important step to assembling a winning case. Assuming competent lawyers on both sides, most cases are won or lost based mostly on the facts that come to light during written and oral discovery.
 Brian J. Ostrom, Ph.D. et. al., Examining Trial Trends in State Courts: 1976-2002, 1 Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 768 (2004)
What to Expect From a Consultation
The purpose of a consultation is to determine whether our firm is a good fit for your legal needs. Although we often discuss expected results and costs, our attorneys do not give legal advice unless and until you choose to retain us. Consultations may carry a charge, depending on the facts of the matter and the area of law. The cost of your consultation, if any, is communicated to you by our intake team or the attorney.