Illinois Consumer Fraud Explained | Elements Of Consumer Fraud In Illinois

Illinois Consumer Fraud Explained | What is Consumer Fraud?

469918662
Updated on:
July 10, 2018

The Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act is a state statute designed to protect consumers from business owners who use deceptive tactics to prey on consumers.  It is referred to by shorthand as the Consumer Fraud Act.  It is easier to maintain a cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act than under common law fraud.

Elements of Common Law Fraud in Illinois

In order to maintain a cause of action for common law fraud, you must plead and prove the following five elements:

  • the defendant must make a false statement of material fact to the plaintiff;
  • ‍the defendant must have made such statement knowing that it was false;
  • the defendant must have made the statement with the intent that the plaintiff rely on it;
  • ‍the plaintiff must have acted in reliance on the statement; and
  • the plaintiff must have been damaged by his reliance on the statement.

Elements of Consumer Fraud in Illinois

However, in order to maintain a cause of action for consumer fraud, you need only prove four elements:

  • ‍a deceptive act or practice by defendant;
  • ‍defendant’s intent that plaintiff rely on the deception; and
  • the deception was involved in the course of conduct of trade or commerce; and
  • ‍actual damage to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant’s violation of the act.

Consumer Fraud vs. Common Law Fraud in Illinois

So why is consumer fraud easier to prove than common law fraud?

  • Rather than prove that the defendant made a knowingly false statement of material fact to the plaintiff, the plaintiff in a consumer fraud action must only prove that the defendant engaged in a deceptive act or practice.  This is broader than common law fraud and fits a wider set of facts.
  • Similarly, the plaintiff in a consumer fraud action need not prove that he relied on the defendant’s false statement and was damaged by such reliance.  Rather, he need only prove that he was damaged as a result of the defendant’s violation of the act.  This is a simpler road to causation.
  • Finally, while common law fraud requires proof by clear and convincing evidence, consumer fraud only requires proof by a preponderance of the evidence.  This is a lower evidentiary standard, which only demands that the evidence show that the defendant is more likely guilty than not guilty.

The catch is that, in order for the Act to come into play, the alleged fraud must have occurred in the course of trade or commerce.  If this requirement is satisfied, the Consumer Fraud Act can be extremely helpful to a potential plaintiff in lowering the exacting standard of pleading and proof required for common law fraud.

Presented By O'Flaherty Law

O'Flaherty Law is happy to meet with you by phone or at our offices in Downers Grove, Elmhurst, Naperville, St. Charles, Lake in the Hills and Tinley Park, Illinois.

What to Expect From a Consultation

The purpose of a free consultation is to determine whether our firm is a good fit for your legal needs. Although we often discuss expected results and costs, our attorneys do not give legal advice unless and until you choose to retain us. Although most consultations are complimentary, some may carry a charge depending on the type of matter and meeting location.

Leave a Comment With Your Questions

Read more about

Commercial and Business Litigation

Illinois Consumer Fraud Explained | What is Consumer Fraud?
Disclaimer: Our articles and comment responses do not constitute legal advice and are not intended to create an attorney-client relationship.

Please contact us to schedule a free consultation for legal advice specific to your situation.

consumer fraud illinoisconsumer fraud act illinoiswhat is consumer fraud?consumer fraud vs. common law fraud in illinoisTypes of consumer fraudconsumer fraud definition

Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required

Here are some articles that may interest you

Categories