In this article...

Watch Our Video
Kevin O'Flaherty

At will employment affects nearly every worker and employer in the U.S., permitting job termination without cause. But what rights do you have within this framework, and what legal exceptions limit these ‘any reason’ terminations? Our guide demystifies at will employment, providing clarity on the critical aspects that shape job security and employers’ flexibility within the legal spectrum.

Key Takeaways

  • At-will employment allows employers to terminate employees for any legal reason without fault or liability, except for discriminatory or retaliatory reasons, and allows employees to leave at any time without legal repercussions.
  • While at-will employment is prevalent across the U.S., it is subject to state-specific restrictions and exceptions, such as public policy, implied contract, and the unique case of Montana requiring ‘good cause’ for termination.
  • Employees under at-will employment have certain protections against wrongful termination based on discriminatory reasons or retaliation, and may be entitled to unemployment benefits if terminated without cause.

Understanding the Basics of At Will Employment

At-will employment, a doctrine rooted in American employment law, creates a unique dynamic between employers and employees. It provides a no-fault freedom for both parties to part ways, with employers having the liberty to terminate employment for any reason, and employees free to leave a job at any time for any or no reason. However, it’s important to note that employers cannot fire an at-will employee for unlawful reasons, which is an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.

This doctrine is often misunderstood. Many believe that an employer cannot terminate an employee without a justified reason. However, the law allows termination for any legal reason or no reason at all. This rule applies unless explicitly stated otherwise by the employer, meaning employment is at-will by default and may only be terminated for cause if an employer indicates this as a policy.

Defining 'At Will'

So what exactly does ‘at-will’ mean? The term ‘at will’ refers to the nature of the employment relationship. An employer has the right to terminate an employee for any legal reason, except an illegal one, without facing legal consequences. Additionally, the employer can also terminate an employee without providing a reason, as long as it is not illegal. The employee has the freedom to resign from their job at any time, without facing any legal repercussions, regardless of the reason. This ensures that the employee has the flexibility to make career decisions as needed. It’s a reciprocal doctrine, meaning just as an employer may dismiss an employee without warning or reason, the employee is equally entitled to leave their job without reason or warning.

The Scope of At Will Employment

While the at-will rule is a general norm, its scope varies from state to state. Some states have specific restrictions and exceptions that can alter the at-will relationship. These exceptions include:

  • The public policy exception, which can be interpreted broadly or narrowly depending on the state
  • Statutory exceptions that create circumstances in which the rules of at-will employment don’t apply
  • Various exemptions that employees may be subject to

Interestingly, Montana is unique in completely eliminating the at-will employment rule, requiring a good cause for termination post-probation.

The Flexibility and Limitations of At Will Employment

Illustration of a scale representing the flexibility and limitations of at-will employment

At-will employment is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers flexibility to both employers and employees, enabling a dynamic and adaptable labor market. At will employment means that employers can adjust their workforce in response to changing business needs without legal concerns of breach of contract. On the other hand, it can create job instability and a sense of insecurity for employees due to the lack of requirement for employers to provide a cause for termination.

Employers can terminate at-will employees without providing a reason, thus no justification is needed as long as the reason is not illegal. But the rule of at-will employment is not absolute. It is bound by exceptions such as public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith.

The Freedom to Part Ways

At-will employment provides a no-fault framework for termination. This means that neither party needs to provide a fault-based reason for ending the employment relationship. This freedom can be empowering for employees, offering them the autonomy to leave for better opportunities or conditions without legal repercussions. However, it can also lead to sudden job loss if an employer decides to exercise this right.

Recognized Exceptions to the Rule

While at-will employment provides considerable leeway, there are recognized exceptions that limit its scope. The public policy exception protects employees from termination for reasons that would contravene public interest, such as refusing to perform acts that state law prohibits or reporting violations of the law. Some states recognize an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, prohibiting employers from dismissing employees maliciously or in bad faith.

State-specific exceptions to the at-will employment doctrine, such as statutory protections, can enhance job security and limit an employer’s right to terminate, potentially leading to wrongful discharge claims.

Analyzing Employer's Rights Under At Will Doctrine

From an employer’s perspective, at-will employment provides substantial advantages. An employer has the legal right to dismiss an employee without stating a reason or giving notice, as long as they don’t violate any laws, such as discrimination laws. Employers have considerable leeway under at-will employment to terminate employees for a wide range of reasons – from poor performance or misconduct to trivial or no reason at all.

Moreover, employers have the freedom to alter the terms of the employment agreement, including modifications to pay, benefits, and working hours. However, it’s advised for employers to document the employee’s behaviors leading to dismissal and manage the employee’s access to sensitive information and company property prior to termination.

Additionally, when terminating an employee, treating them respectfully, which may include providing a clear letter of termination without listing exhaustive reasons, is considered best practice. Finally, employers are required to pay the final wages of terminated employees within a specified timeframe, often shortly after the termination or by the next regular pay period.

The Power to Change Terms

Under at-will agreements, employers have the right to change employment terms at any time without prior notice. This includes modifications to job duties and compensation. While this provides flexibility to employers, it can create uncertainty for employees, further highlighting the need for clear communication and understanding of terms between both parties.

When Employers Can't Terminate

Despite the broad powers of employers under at-will employment, there are situations in which employers can’t terminate. These include terminations for discriminatory reasons, in retaliation for certain actions, or for exercising legally protected rights. Federal and state laws protect at-will employees from termination based on:

  • race
  • color
  • religion
  • sex
  • national origin
  • age
  • disability
  • veteran status

Terminations must have a just cause and be unrelated to the employee’s protected status, with employers needing a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for ending an at-will employment.

Therefore, employers are advised to thoroughly review the grounds for terminating at-will employees to ensure they do not infringe upon any laws against discrimination or retaliation.

Employee Protections and Responsibilities

While at-will employment can be daunting for employees due to its inherent uncertainties, employees are not without protections. There are various laws and regulations in place to protect employees from wrongful termination. An implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing may apply to employment relationships, requiring honesty and absence of malice, although few employers have been found liable under this theory.

Approximately seventeen states provide whistleblower protection for private sector employees. Additionally, this protection is extended to employees who report illegal activities in their workplace. However, the responsibilities that employees have within an at-will employment relationship require further exploration.

Job Security Concerns

The flexibility of at-will employment, unfortunately, leaves employees vulnerable to unexpected job loss and fluctuating work schedules. At-will employment allows employers to:

  • Terminate employees without needing to explain why, which can contribute to job instability since employees may also quit without notice.
  • Remove job security, leaving workers feeling insecure about their employment status.
  • Keep employees constantly worried about the possibility of losing their jobs.

There are instances of bad faith terminations, such as firing employees to avoid paying retirement benefits or just before they earn a large commission, which might entitle the employee to protections. Compensation for wrongful termination can include reimbursement for lost wages, lost benefits, and emotional distress, often resolved through out-of-court settlements.

Legal Off-Duty Activities

While at work, employees are expected to adhere to their employer’s rules and policies, as well as any applicable federal law. But what about their activities outside of work? Several states have implemented laws to protect at-will employees who partake in legal acts outside of work from being discriminated against by their employers. Protected legal off-duty activities can include certain lifestyle choices such as smoking or drinking, engaging in political activities, and volunteering for civic organizations. These state-level protections exist as long as the employee’s legal off-duty activities do not interfere with the employer’s business or pose a conflict of interest.

Navigating Contractual Agreements and Handbooks

Employment contracts and employee handbooks play a significant role in at-will employment. An at-will employment clause is often explicitly included within the terms of an employment contract to clarify the at-will nature of the employment. These contracts lay the groundwork by detailing the terms of an at-will employment relationship, setting clear expectations for both employer and employee.

Contracts may contain terms that alter the at-will relationship by stipulating conditions under which employment may be terminated or by setting a defined employment term. At-will employment agreements, by default, state that employment is not for a set term but instead is intended to continue indefinitely until either party decides to terminate it.

Implied Employment Contracts

While explicit contracts lay out the terms of employment in black and white, an implied employment contract can be more nuanced. These can arise from an employer’s actions or verbal statements, creating enforceable terms affecting employment duration and restricting at-will termination. These true legal contracts can supersede existing agreements and impact employee expectations of job security.

Employee handbooks can inadvertently establish implied contracts if not drafted carefully, altering the at-will employment relationship. The implied contract exception may create a presumption of continued employment based on handbook language or other employer assurances. Therefore, employers need to exercise caution in their communications and practices to prevent the unintentional formation of implied contracts that can undermine at-will employment.

The Significance of Employee Handbooks

Employee handbooks play a pivotal role in defining the relationship between an employer and an employee. To avoid creating implied contracts, employers should clearly state that employment is at-will in:

  • job applications
  • offers
  • contracts
  • the employee handbook.

By using clear and unambiguous disclaimers on written materials and reserving the right to modify policies and procedures at any time, employers can further protect themselves regarding implied contracts and policies.

Special Considerations: Montana's Unique Position

While at-will employment is the norm in most states, Montana stands out for its unique approach. Under the Montana Wrongful Discharge Act, employers are required to have ‘good cause’ to terminate employees who have completed their probationary period. Good cause for termination includes job-related reasons such as failure to perform duties or disrupting the employer’s business.

If an employer does not follow its own written personnel policies when firing an employee, it can be considered a wrongful discharge. Montana law mandates that employers must inform employees of the grievance procedure within seven days of termination and provide the written policy.

It’s also important to note that the Montana Wrongful Discharge Act does not apply to employees who are working under a collective bargaining agreement.

Navigating Termination and Unemployment Claims

The termination of an at-will employment relationship can be a challenging time for employees. Despite the uncertainty, it’s crucial to know that there are mechanisms in place to protect employees. For instance, if an employee is terminated without cause and not for misconduct, they may be eligible to file for unemployment benefits, provided they meet other state-specific criteria.

At-will employees who are terminated through no fault of their own are often eligible for unemployment benefits in many states. This provides support to those who have lost their jobs unexpectedly.

Understanding Wrongful Termination

Wrongful termination can be a major concern for at-will employees. It occurs when an employer dismisses an employee for unlawful reasons, including:

  • Discrimination
  • Retaliation
  • Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
  • Violation of public policy

To prove wrongful termination, an employee would need to supply evidence like direct statements or circumstantial evidence that indicates an illegal motive for the dismissal.

Employees who are wrongfully terminated may be eligible for compensatory damages, punitive damages, and attorney fees. Wrongfully terminated employees can seek legal redress, often starting by contacting an employment lawyer to discuss their case and potentially file a lawsuit.

Unemployment Claims Post-Termination

In addition to legal redress for wrongful termination, employees may be entitled to unemployment benefits after termination. If an employee is terminated without cause and not for misconduct, they may be eligible to file for unemployment benefits, provided they meet other state-specific criteria.

At-will employees who are terminated through no fault of their own are often eligible for unemployment benefits in many states. This provides support to those who have lost their jobs unexpectedly. It’s crucial for employees to understand their rights and the resources available to them following termination.

The Interplay Between At Will Employment and Union Representation

While at-will employment is the default in the U.S., the dynamics can change when a union is involved. Unionized employees have additional protection against at-will termination through their collective bargaining agreements. These agreements often require a ‘for cause’ justification for termination, thereby providing a higher standard of protection for unionized workers compared to non-union at-will employees. Grievance procedures in collective bargaining agreements enable unionized employees to dispute wrongful terminations via negotiation or arbitration rather than directly through the employer.

Protected activities, such as efforts to unionize, political expression, and whistleblowing, further secure public sector employees, especially those who are unionized, from employer retaliation.

Considering the Future of At Will Employment

Given the ever-evolving nature of the workplace, the future of at-will employment may be influenced by various factors. Trends in litigation, particularly concerning the classification of employees in the gig economy, are expected to impact the at-will employment doctrine. Additionally, employee data management and concerns surrounding data privacy are expected to become increasingly important issues in employment law, which could impact the operation of the at-will employment concept.

However, the at-will employment presumption continues to be retained due to various reasons, including:

  • Respect for freedom of contract
  • Deference towards an employer’s decision-making
  • The shared preference by employers and employees for the flexibility of at-will employment over guaranteed job security.


At-will employment, a cornerstone of the American employment landscape, offers both flexibility and challenges for employers and employees alike. It provides a no-fault framework for ending employment but can also lead to job instability and insecurity. While employers have considerable leeway under at-will employment, there are recognized exceptions that protect employees. Although at-will employment is the norm, Montana’s unique position and union representation offer different approaches. As trends in litigation, data privacy, and the gig economy evolve, so too may the landscape of at-will employment. Understanding the intricacies of at-will employment is key for both employers and employees to navigate this complex terrain.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the at-will rule for employment?

At-will employment means that an employer can terminate an employee for almost any reason, with a few exceptions under state and federal law. This type of employment agreement allows for termination by either the employer or the employee.

What is the opposite of at-will employment?

The opposite of at-will employment is contract employment, which outlines specific terms of employment such as duties, work hours, length of employment, salary, and benefits. This provides a clear structure and protection for both the employee and the employer.

What is the difference between at-will and right to work states?

In at-will employment, the focus is on termination, while right-to-work states allow employees the choice of joining a union and limit employer's ability to terminate union-represented employees. This means in at-will employment, termination is of prime importance, whereas right-to-work states give employees the choice of union representation and restrict employers' power to terminate union members.

What is at-will employment?

At-will employment allows an employer to terminate an employee at any time for any reason, as long as it's not illegal, and also allows employees to leave their job at any time without facing legal consequences. This principle provides flexibility for both employers and employees.

What are some exceptions to at-will employment?

Some exceptions to at-will employment include public policy, implied contract, and implied covenant of good faith, which limit the circumstances under which an employer can terminate an employee.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this blog is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Each individual's legal needs are unique, and these materials may not be applicable to your legal situation. Always seek the advice of a competent attorney with any questions you may have regarding a legal issue. Do not disregard professional legal advice or delay in seeking it because of something you have read on this blog.

FREE Business, Corporate & Contract LawE-Book

Get my FREE E-Book

Similar Articles

Learn about Law